A Normativity Wager for Skeptics

Several philosophers have recently advanced wager-based arguments for the existence of irreducibly normative truths or against nihilism. Here I consider whether these would cause a Pyrrhonian skeptic to lose her skepticism. conclude they not do so directly. However, if prompted different decision problem, which call normativity wager skeptics, be motivated attempt act in accordance with any reasons she might subject. Consideration will inevitably skepticism, but there are at least three routes by it might: first, considering agent may spontaneously (non-rationally) acquire belief; second, can motivate herself belief. Via either indirect, non-rational routes, cease skeptic. Thus, consideration value, even does supply rational argument that dissuade skeptics. In addition, possibility third (rational) route